United States v Arnold, Schwinn Co., 237 F. Supp. 323

The Paramount used high-strength chrome-molybdenum steel alloy tubing and expensive brass lug-brazed construction. During the next twenty years, most of the Paramount bikes would be built in limited numbers at a small frame shop headed by Wastyn, in spite of Schwinn’s continued efforts to bring all frame production into the factory. schwinn ebike The impact… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn Co., 237 F. Supp. 323

United States v Arnold, Schwinn Co., 237 F. Supp. 323

He does not get a reduced price by making a direct order to Schwinn. Adequate service and repair is an absolute essential for any bicycle manufacturing schwinn dealers company. If the retail sales agency of such a manufacturing company cannot or does not furnish such service the customer finds himself stranded. The evidence reveals and… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn Co., 237 F. Supp. 323

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. Case Brief for Law School

The result, a wheelie bike, was introduced to the public as the Schwinn Sting-Ray in June 1963. During the 1960s, Schwinn aggressively campaigned to retain and expand its dominance of the child and youth bicycle markets. The company advertised heavily on television, and was an early sponsor schwinn dealers of the children’s television program Captain… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. Case Brief for Law School

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

Hop on the Schwinn® IC2 Indoor cycle trainer, and you’ll experience a unique workout that simulates the real-life cycling feel of an outdoor bike in a controlled, hard-pedaling indoor environment. And with its innovative system that adjusts resistance levels in continuous increments, you’ll burn calories while feeling like you’re riding through rolling hills. The IC2… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

This bike is made around a lightweight and strong aluminum frame that doesn’t feature internal cable routing, which is one of the main downsides. Traxion also has 24 gears with a Shimano rear derailleur and capable 29 x 2.25″ knobby tires. Of course, mechanical disc brakes come with the package as well, so you can… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

The appellees did not appeal from the findings and order invalidating restraints on resale by distributors who purchase products from Schwinn. Introducing Carbon Blue™ technology – a belt drive system combining unmatched durability with the authentic outdoor biking feel you expect from Schwinn. Powered by personalized zones, accountability and an instructor who will push riders… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center

Schwinn sold an impressive 1.5 million bicycles in 1974, but would pay the price for failing to keep up with new developments in bicycle technology and buying trends. By 1950, Schwinn had decided the time was right to grow the brand. At the time, most bicycle manufacturers in the United States sold in bulk to… Continue reading United States v Arnold, Schwinn & Co. :: 388 U.S. 365 1967 :: Justia US Supreme Court Center